Compare
Cursor vs Warp Agent CLI
Cursor is an AI-first editor; Warp's agent lives in the terminal and can run Warp's own agent, Claude Code or Codex. Editor people pick Cursor; terminal people pick Warp.
At a glance
| Fact | Cursor | Warp Agent CLI |
|---|---|---|
| Made by | Anysphere (part of SpaceX) | Warp |
| What it is | An AI-first code editor with a built-in coding agent. | A coding agent built for the terminal, with remote sessions and multiple agents working together. |
| Price | Free plan, paid from $8/month | Free plan, paid from $20/month |
| Runs on | macOS, Windows, Linux, Web, CLI, Slack, iOS | macOS, Windows, Linux, CLI |
| Open source | No | No |
| Models | Composer | Fable 5, Claude Opus 5, GPT-5.6, Gemini 3.1 Pro |
| Last verified | October 14, 2026 | October 14, 2026 |
| Official site | cursor.com | warp.dev/agent-cli |
Where they differ
- Shape: Cursor is an editor with a CLI; Warp is a terminal-first agent with remote sessions.
- Agents: Warp can run several agents together and lets you choose Warp Agent, Claude Code or Codex.
- Price: both have free plans; Cursor's paid plans start at $8/month, Warp Build is $20/month.
Which to pick
Choose Cursor if you want the agent inside a full code editor.
Choose Warp Agent CLI if you work in the terminal and on remote machines.
Keep looking
- Cursor listing
- Warp Agent CLI listing
- Cursor alternatives
- Claude Code vs Cursor
- Cline vs Cursor
- Codex vs Cursor
- Cursor vs Devin
Facts from each maker's official pages, last verified October 14, 2026. How we verify.