Compare
Cursor vs Kiro
Both are AI-first editors with a CLI. Kiro, from AWS, turns prompts into specs and builds with parallel agents; Cursor is the more established editor with cloud agents and code review.
At a glance
| Fact | Cursor | Kiro |
|---|---|---|
| Made by | Anysphere (part of SpaceX) | Amazon Web Services |
| What it is | An AI-first code editor with a built-in coding agent. | AWS's agentic coding IDE and CLI that turns prompts into specs and builds with parallel agents. |
| Price | Free plan, paid from $8/month | Free plan, paid from $20/user/month |
| Runs on | macOS, Windows, Linux, Web, CLI, Slack, iOS | macOS, Windows, Linux, CLI |
| Open source | No | No |
| Models | Composer | Not stated |
| Last verified | October 14, 2026 | October 14, 2026 |
| Official site | cursor.com | kiro.dev |
Where they differ
- Approach: Kiro is spec-first with hooks and steering; Cursor is agent-first with Bugbot reviews.
- Price: both have free plans; Cursor's paid plans start at $8/month, Kiro Pro is $20/user/month.
- Platforms: both run on Mac, Windows and Linux with a CLI.
Which to pick
Choose Cursor if you want the widely used editor with cloud agents and reviews.
Choose Kiro if you like writing specs first, or your team builds on AWS.
Keep looking
- Cursor listing
- Kiro listing
- Cursor alternatives
- Claude Code vs Cursor
- Claude Code vs Kiro
- Cline vs Cursor
- Codex vs Cursor
Facts from each maker's official pages, last verified October 14, 2026. How we verify.