Compare
Cursor vs Google Antigravity
Both are agent-centered editors. Google Antigravity is free for individuals with weekly limits and runs Gemini; Cursor has its own free plan, cloud agents and code reviews.
At a glance
| Fact | Cursor | Google Antigravity |
|---|---|---|
| Made by | Anysphere (part of SpaceX) | |
| What it is | An AI-first code editor with a built-in coding agent. | Google's agent-based development product: a code editor, command-line tool and agent manager. |
| Price | Free plan, paid from $8/month | Free plan, paid from $30/seat/month |
| Runs on | macOS, Windows, Linux, Web, CLI, Slack, iOS | macOS, Windows, Linux, CLI, API, Android |
| Open source | No | No |
| Models | Composer | Gemini |
| Last verified | October 14, 2026 | October 14, 2026 |
| Official site | cursor.com | antigravity.google |
Where they differ
- Price: Antigravity is $0 for individuals; Cursor is free to start with paid plans from $8/month.
- Agents: Antigravity has an agent manager and command center; Cursor runs cloud agents in parallel with Bugbot reviews.
- Models: Antigravity runs Gemini; Cursor lists its own Composer model.
Which to pick
Choose Cursor if you want the more established editor and code reviews.
Choose Google Antigravity if you want Google's tools and Gemini, free to start.
Keep looking
- Cursor listing
- Google Antigravity listing
- Cursor alternatives
- Claude Code vs Cursor
- Claude Code vs Google Antigravity
- Cline vs Cursor
- Codex vs Cursor
Facts from each maker's official pages, last verified October 14, 2026. How we verify.