§ Comparison · Updated May 2026

Fathom vs Glean.

Fathom and Glean are frequently shortlisted together. Both compete in the productivity space, so the right pick comes down to pricing model, ecosystem, and the specific features you'll lean on. This page lays out the spec sheet, an editor verdict, and answers to the questions people search before choosing.

§ Verdict

Highest rated

Glean

Editor score 4.5/5 — leads on overall quality across our evaluation.

Best value

Fathom

freemium with paid tiers pricing — the lowest-friction option of the group.

Broadest feature set

Fathom

5 headline features — the most all-in-one option.

§ Spec sheet

Rating

Fathom

4.4

Glean

4.5

Pricing

Fathom

Freemium

Glean

Enterprise

Category

Fathom

Productivity

Glean

Productivity

Features

Fathom

• Meeting recording
• AI summaries
• Transcripts and highlights
• CRM sync
• Team collaboration

Glean

• Enterprise search
• Permission-aware knowledge graph
• AI assistant
• Agents over company data
• SaaS connectors

Pros

Fathom

+ Strong free individual plan
+ Great for customer-facing meeting workflows

Glean

+ Strong fit for large company knowledge retrieval
+ Designed around enterprise permissions

Cons

Fathom

− Bot-based meeting capture may not fit every culture
− Team features require paid plans

Glean

− Overkill for small teams
− Requires connector setup and internal data hygiene

Use Cases

Fathom

Sales callsCustomer interviewsMeeting notesCRM updates

Glean

Enterprise searchInternal knowledge assistantEmployee onboardingSupport enablement

Visit

Fathom

Glean

	Fathom AI meeting assistant for recording, transcribing, summarizing, and syncing calls.	Glean Enterprise AI search, assistant, and agent platform over company knowledge.
Rating	4.4	4.5
Pricing	Freemium	Enterprise
Category	Productivity	Productivity
Features	• Meeting recording • AI summaries • Transcripts and highlights • CRM sync • Team collaboration	• Enterprise search • Permission-aware knowledge graph • AI assistant • Agents over company data • SaaS connectors
Pros	+ Strong free individual plan + Great for customer-facing meeting workflows	+ Strong fit for large company knowledge retrieval + Designed around enterprise permissions
Cons	− Bot-based meeting capture may not fit every culture − Team features require paid plans	− Overkill for small teams − Requires connector setup and internal data hygiene
Use Cases	Sales callsCustomer interviewsMeeting notesCRM updates	Enterprise searchInternal knowledge assistantEmployee onboardingSupport enablement
Visit

§ Best for

Pick Fathom for

Sales teams who need sales calls.

Read full review →

Pick Glean for

Enterprises who need enterprise search.

Read full review →

§ Common questions

Fathom vs Glean — which is better?

It depends on what you're optimizing for. Glean edges Fathom on our editor rating (4.5 vs 4.4), but ratings are a coarse signal. The verdict above breaks down which one wins for budget, feature breadth, and self-hosting.

Which of these is free?

Fathom is the no-cost option in this comparison (freemium with paid tiers). The rest charge per seat, per token, or by usage.

When should I pick Fathom over Glean?

Pick Fathom when sales calls matters more than Glean's strengths in enterprise search. The "best for" callouts above translate this into concrete personas.

Are there other tools to consider?

Yes — every tool in this comparison has its own alternatives page that ranks the closest competitors. Click any tool name to drill into its full review and alternatives list.

§ Related comparisons

Otter Ai vs Fathom Fathom vs Fireflies Ai

All comparisons

Editorial verdicts, not algorithmicDisagree? Tell us →